Los Angeles 2024 Olympic venue plan impresses IOC committee in bid visit
LOS ANGELES – Following a visit to evaluate Los Angeles’ bid for the 2024 Olympics, the International Olympic Committee’s commission couldn’t pick one adjective to describe the proposed venues.
So it chose many, all superlative, to describe what the group had seen over its three-day visit here last week.
As that commission takes its tour of Paris, which concludes Tuesday, it is LA 2024’s venue plan that left the impression bid leaders had hoped for. That plan, one which does not require the construction of any permanent venues, is one that they hope can help them secure the Games.
“The commission members were almost ecstatic about the level of the venues that they’ve found and that they’ve seen and that they’ve been able to meet those people that manage those venues,” said Patrick Baumann, chair of the IOC’s evaluation commission. “It goes from spectacular venues to impressive venues to mind-blowing venues to incredible venues. That certainly is an incredibly positive thing. And it’s positive because we’ve been able to really see them.”
MORE COVERAGE:
With Emmanuel Macron on board, Paris 2024 bid is 'ready right now'
LA 2024 focused on that Olympic Games during IOC visit, not 2028 possibility
The commission’s tour on Thursday included nearly all the venues, including iconic sites like the Rose Bowl and Coliseum. The IOC evaluators took shots on the Staples Center court. And they toured the campuses of UCLA and USC, where the athletes’ and media villages, respectively, would be located.
“It’s certainly an incredible asset to be able to have a village that we could walk them through,” said LA 2024 chairman Casey Wasserman. “It wasn’t about greenfield sites or blueprints. It was about touching and feeling.”
IOC members who will select a 2024 (and maybe also a 2028) host in September don’t have to reveal how they voted or why. But, ostensibly, the importance of venues should play a role under Agenda 2020, a series of reforms that aims to cut the cost of bidding and make the Games more sustainable by encouraging the use of existing venues, among other things.
That change, in effect for the first time in this bidding process, comes in response to a history of cost overruns that have left previous host cities with white elephants that cause budgets to skyrocket and serve little use beyond the Games.
“What we’re seeing with the venues is the fundamental problem with the Olympics,” said Victor Matheson, an economist at Holy Cross who has studied the cost of hosting the Games. “The Olympics has so many extremely specialized sports that the venues become really problematic.”
While the soccer stadiums needed to host a World Cup can find many other uses after the event, it’s often difficult to find sustained use for things like a velodrome or canoeing course.
Los Angeles’ bid would require extensive retrofitting – including the installation of a track in the Coliseum – and temporary venues, but it would not require any permanent construction.
Paris, the only other city bidding against LA, would have to build an athletes’ village – usually one of the most costly venues to construct -- and a swimming pool.
“Our trip to the Olympic village at UCLA seemed to resonate particularly powerfully because this group knows better than anyone just how challenging and just how critically important delivering the village is,” Wasserman said.
LA 2024 fielded questions about its use of sports parks, with four proposed to allow for cost reduction through shared resources rather than having one large Olympic park. The plan would make it easier for fans to see multiple events in one secure zone.
“I think it’s exciting to be able to have these kind of grouped locations in very iconic places throughout the city,” said six-time Olympic gold medalist Allyson Felix, whose support of the bid included showing commission members around USC. “I think it flows really well, and I think from an athletes’ side, it’s what excites us. It’s a great plan.”
To be sure, it is still a plan. Should Los Angeles be awarded the Games, the hard work would be in the construction of temporary venues and retrofitting of current ones.
But, for the most part, bid organizers stuck to their message. Look at our venues. They already exist.
Rather than blueprints, LA 2024 posted large plexiglass displays outside the venues showing what they would look like during the Olympics.
“That might be easier to envision than what most cities come to the Olympics in, where they say, we’ve got nothing, but imagine if you will an 80,000-seat track stadium,” Matheson said. “In some ways, it’s a lot easier for an IOC member to envision – OK, here’s the Coliseum. Now imagine a track in that back like we had in 1984.”
The IOC commission members didn’t have to use their imagination, though. The LA 2024 team created augmented reality videos that the members used at select venues, including the Coliseum. So holding a device up, the evaluators could see a virtual video of the track that would be put in the stadium.
At the site of the NFL stadium to be completed in Inglewood by 2019, IOC evaluators saw a virtual reality video of what it would look like with Wasserman explaining how it would suit the Olympics.
By all accounts, it was a wow moment on a visit where IOC commission members only had to see to believe what an Olympics in Los Angeles would look like.
“This visit has certainly confirmed our opinion that Los Angeles has developed an excellent proposal and probably given the facilities that are available here and what is already ready, seven years of lead time is a luxury here in this city,” said Baumann. “We’ve seen excellent venues, including legacy venues from the 1932 and 1984 Games. And those venues remind us that smart planning leads to great Olympic legacies.
“Los Angeles is already a great Olympic city, but after these three days, we now realize that was an understatement.”
PHOTOS: Every medal won by U.S. at 2016 Rio Games
